Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

658 So. 2d 175

Clerico v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-07-26

Relies on Anders v. California · 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-07-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2014

5 state decisions

20199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Alberto Clerieo III appeals the judgment and sentence imposed upon him after a jury found him guilty of tampering with a witness, contrary to section 914.22, Florida Statutes (1993). Clerieo’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After reviewing the record, we see no error in regard to the conviction and therefore affirm the conviction. The court erred, however, in imposing $693 in costs without citing statutory authority for those costs. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We, accordingly, reverse and remand with instructions to strike these costs. Upon remand, the state may seek to reimpose this item of costs in accordance with the law. See Reyes.

¶2Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
/658/so2d/175 · .json · Public domain