658 So. 2d 42 - Higley v. Higley’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty. · Shaffer v. Heitner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he defendant clearly expected to be able to enforce the contract in Louisiana in the event of default, thereby availing himself of the privilege of conducting activities within the state and invoking the benefits and protections of the state's laws.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sanders v. Sanders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.