658 So. 2d 683 - State v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
117 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 851 So. 2d 921 - State v. Tate (2003), 936 So. 2d 108 - State v. Leger (2006)
117 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Ross v. Oklahoma · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 622 So. 2d 198 - State v. Bourque · 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality,”
55 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is an important part of voir dire examination to discover any prospective juror who may have difficulty understanding his right (the presumption of innocence) as well as to discover a juror who may hold it against a defendant who exercises the right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.