Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 658 SW2D 267 - O'Brien v. State

O'Brien v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 1994
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rice v. Norman Williams Co. · Bradley v. J. F. Batte & Sons of Richmond, Inc. · Hankins v. State · Sheffield v. State · Swink v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To prevent any misunderstanding, we take this opportunity to emphasize that the summary refusal of a petition for discretionary review by this Court is of no prece-dential value. This is true where the petition is refused without opinion, as is the usual practice, as well as where the petition is refused with a brief opinion disavowing the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals, as in the instant case. The Bench and Bar of the State should not assume that the summary refusal of a petition for discretionary review lends any additional authority to the opinion of the Court of Appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.