Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 658 SW2D 620 - Parr v. State

Parr v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2012 · most notably Bell v. State (1985), Earls v. State (1986)

25 state decisions

1101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Denno · Royster v. State · Griffin v. State · McBrayer v. State · Eldred v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Thus, in determining whether a charge on a lesser included offense is required, a two step analysis is to be used. First, the lesser included offense must be included within the proof necessary to establish the offense charged. Secondly, there must be some evidence in the record that if the defendant is guilty, he is guilty of only the lesser offense.” (Citation omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““An offense is a lesser included offense if: “(1) it is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged....””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.