Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation Atlas Container Co Inc Cfs v. Alton Box Board Co Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation Atlas Container Co Inc Cfs’s Empirical Analysis
659 F.2d 1337 · 1981
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2010
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2010
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc. · Cotton v. Hinton · Adams Extract Co. v. Pleasure Hours, Inc. · Young v. Katz · Adams Extract Co. v. Chesapeake Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he proof of adequate representation is in the adequacy of the settlements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,507 Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders v. City of Seattle Public Utility District No. 1 of Ferry County, Washington Public Utility District No. 1 of Kittitas County, Washington Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Small Utilities Group, Alder Mutual Light Company City of Blaine, Washington, City of Sumas, Washington Orcas Power & Light Company, Washington Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington Washington Public Utilities Group Public Utility District No. 1 of Mason County Town of Steilacoom Chelan County Public Utility District, Douglas County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County City of Richland Public Utility District No. 1 of Franklin County Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Columbia Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. Wood Dawson Smith & Hellman Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates, Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Blyth Eastman Paine Webber Incorporated, Bernard A. Heerey, Applicants in Intervention Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders v. City of Seattle Public Utility District No. 1 of Ferry County, Washington Public Utility District No. 1 of Kittitas County, Washington Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Small Utilities Group, Alder Mutual Light Company City of Blaine, Washington, City of Sumas, Washington Orcas Power & Light Company, Washington Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington Washington Public Utilities Group Public Utility District No. 1 of Mason County Town of Steilacoom Chelan County Public Utility District, Douglas County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County City of Richland Public Utility District No. 1 of Franklin County Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Columbia Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. Wood Dawson Smith & Hellman Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates, Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington City of McMinnville Oregon City of Drain, Oregon Alan H. Jones Blyth Eastman Paine Webber Incorporated, C. Richard Lehmann, Applicant in Intervention Class Chemical Bank in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders, Arthur Hoffer, L.T. Samuels Norman Benson John Joseph Eugene L. Lentzner Ann Lentzner as Co-Trustees of the Eugene Lentzner and Ann Lentzner Living Trust v. City of Seattle Public Utility District No. 1 of Ferry County, Washington Public Utility District No. 1 of Kittitas County, Washington Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Small Utilities Group, Alder Mutual Light Company City of Blaine, Washington, City of Sumas, Washington Orcas Power & Light Company, Washington Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington Washington Public Utilities Group Public Utility District No. 1 of Mason County Town of Steilacoom Chelan County Public Utility District, Douglas County Public Utility District Grant County Public Utility District Public Utility District No. 1 of Clallam County City of Richland Public Utility District No. 1 of Franklin County Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County Columbia Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. Wood Dawson Smith & Hellman Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates, Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington City of McMinnville Oregon City of Drain, Oregon Alan H. Jones Blyth Eastman Paine Webber Incorporated, Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders v. City of Seattle Public Utility District No. 1, Bernard A. Heerey, Applicant in Intervention Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders v. City of Seattle Public Utility District No. 1, C. Richard Lehmann, Applicant in Intervention · Class
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.