Clark v. Unified Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
659 F.2d 49 · 1981
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 41 U.S.C. § 351 (Service Contract) · 41 U.S.C. § 352 · 41 U.S.C. § 353 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Thorpe v. Housing Authority of Durham · Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. · Howard Johnson Company Inc v. Detroit Local Joint Executive Board Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“those portions of the seniority provisions which might require a successor to hire a predecessor's employees, and which designate a precise system for hirings and lay offs are not, in themselves fringe benefits within the meaning of the Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“or, where a collective-bargaining agreement covers any such service employees,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“irrational and not reasonably related to the purposes of the legislation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.