Tobias Q. Poole v. E. P. Perini’s Empirical Analysis
659 F.2d 730 · 1981
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2003 · most notably United States v. Nazemian (1991), Brown v. Darcy (1986)
33 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Bruton v. United States · Wainwright v. Sykes · Townsend v. Sain · Cupp v. Naughten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An adoptive confession avoids the confrontation problem because the words of the hearsay become the words of the defendant.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“has not been denied effective assistance by erroneous tactical decisions if, at the time, the decisions would have seemed reasonable to the competent trial attorney. See Beasley v. United States, 491 F.2d 687 , 696 (6th Cir.1974).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Adams v. Jago“a defendant cannot adopt an out-of-court statement as his own without some affirmative action on his part.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Fuson v. Jago
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.