Williams v. Citigroup Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
659 F.3d 208 · 2011
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Foman v. Davis · Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill · ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“absent evidence of undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, undue prejudice to the opposing party, or futility.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]his permissive standard is consistent with our strong preference for resolving disputes on the merits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where ... a 'party does not seek leave to file an amended complaint until after judgment is entered, Rule 15's liberality must be tempered by considerations of finality.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.