Mallory v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Graham v. Connor · Farmer v. Brennan · Thomas v. Arn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here [was] no evidence of history of tension or altercations between Mallory and Higgins which would have put the Defendants on notice, nor was there any evidence that Higgins had any particular animosity directed towards Mallory that would have necessitated any protective action by prison officials”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Madison v. Cruz“103 C.M.R. 491 .09(1). The grievance must be filed within ten working days of the actual incident. 103 C.M.R. 491 .08(4). The Institutional Grievance Coordinator must”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schultz v. Doher
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.