Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2013
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. State · Norton v. State · Terry v. State · Barany v. State · Fugate v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To convict the defendant, the State must have proved each of the following elements: 1. William Fred Taylor 2. intentionally 3. engaged in conduct of fleeing from lawful detention 4. which was a substantial step toward the commission of the crime of escape, the intentional fleeing from lawful detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Neuhoff v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.