Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 P2D 443 - State v. Petree

State v. Petree’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

104 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably State v. Garcia (1987), State v. Walker (1987)

104 state decisions

65019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Miller · State v. Lamm · State v. Romero · State v. Kerekes · State v. Daniels

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e review the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict of the jury. We reverse a jury conviction for insufficient evidence only when the evidence, so viewed, is sufficiently inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime of which he was convicted.”
    29 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"[Nlotwithstanding the presumptions in favor of the jury's decision[,}] this Court still has the right to review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The fabric of evidence against the defendant must cover the gap between the presumption of innocence and the proof of guilt. In fulfillment of its duty to review the evidence and all inferences which may reasonably be drawn from it in the light most favorable to the verdict, the reviewing court will stretch the evidentiary fabric as far as it will go. But this does not mean that the court can take a speculative leap across a remaining gap in order to sustain a verdict."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We ... consider the evidence presented in this case in a light most favorable to the jury's verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.