Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 SO2D 1069 - Cherry v. State

Cherry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

107 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State (2000), 768 So. 2d 1037 - Occhicone v. State (2000)

107 state decisions

730199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Swansboro Country, Inc. v. Lumberman's Mortgage Co. · 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the `counsel' guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Unless a defendant makes both showings, it cannot be said that the conviction or death sentence resulted from a breakdown in the adversary process that renders the result unreliable.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The standard is not how present counsel would have proceeded, in hindsight, but rather whether there was both a deficient performance and a reasonable probability of a different result.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.