State v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 1996
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · In re Disbarment of Sacco · DiCarlantonio v. United States · Anderson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“DOES THE "RULE OF CONSISTENCY" EXCEPTION, AS IT RELATES TO A JURY VERDICT IN A SINGLE CASE AND TRIAL WHERE ALL BUT ONE OF THE CO-CONSPIRATORS ARE ACQUITTED, REMAIN VIABLE IN FLORIDA FOLLOWING THE DECISIONS IN UNITED STATES v. POWELL, 469 U.S. 57 [ 105 S.Ct. 471 , 83 L.Ed.2d 461 ] (1984) AND UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS, 850 F.2d 1557 (11TH CIR. 1988), CERT. DENIED, 488 U.S. 1032 [ 109 S.Ct. 842 , 102 L.Ed.2d 974 ] (1989), THE LATTER OF WHICH OVERRULED FEDERAL CASE LAW UPON WHICH THE FLORIDA EXCEPTION WAS ORIGINALLY BASED?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.