Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 SO2D 191 - Turley v. State

Turley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · 549 So. 2d 122 - Holladay v. State · Putman v. Zant · 549 So. 2d 135 - Ex Parte Holladay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In this case, no rebuttal testimony was offered to the evidence that the appellant’s mental capacity was below average. However, there was absolutely no evidence presented that the appellant’s mental capacity was so low that she could not understand her Miranda rights. The appellant indicated that she understood these rights, and she signed a waiver of rights form. There was testimony that the appellant did not appear to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs, was not offered any reward, and was not threatened or induced to make a statement. The court did not err in receiving the appellant’s confession into evidence at trial.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.