Turley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · 549 So. 2d 122 - Holladay v. State · Putman v. Zant · 549 So. 2d 135 - Ex Parte Holladay
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this case, no rebuttal testimony was offered to the evidence that the appellant’s mental capacity was below average. However, there was absolutely no evidence presented that the appellant’s mental capacity was so low that she could not understand her Miranda rights. The appellant indicated that she understood these rights, and she signed a waiver of rights form. There was testimony that the appellant did not appear to be under the influence of alcohol or drugs, was not offered any reward, and was not threatened or induced to make a statement. The court did not err in receiving the appellant’s confession into evidence at trial.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Albarran v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.