Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 So. 2d 201 - Bates v. State

659 So. 2d 201 - Bates v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. United States · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · Young v. State · Connecticut v. Mohegan Tribe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The preferable instruction for a `hung jury' is set forth in Alabama Pattern Jury Instructions—Criminal, Instruction 1.8, Hung Jury: "`Members of the jury, I am sorry to hear that you are unable to reach a verdict. The Court cannot release you at this time. You should make further efforts to arrive at a verdict. Each juror is entitled to his or her opinion of the evidence, but I know that you do not wish to put the State to the expense of another trial if it can be avoided. If you cannot agree, a mistrial would be declared and this case would have to be tried again. There is no reason to believe that another jury would have better or clearer evidence than has been presented to you. "`This does not mean that you surrender an honest conviction as to the weight or the effect of any evidence solely because of the opinion of other jurors or because of the importance of arriving at a decision. But you should give respectful consideration to each other's views and talk over any difference of opinion in a spirit of fairness and candor. If possible, you should resolve any differences and come to a common conclusion so that the case may be completed. "`I would be happy to give you an explanatory charge on the law. "`It is natural that differences of opinion will arise. When they do, each juror should not only express his opinion but the facts and reasons upon which he bases that opinion. By reasoning the matter out it may be possible for all jurors to agree. What I have said to you mu”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"All right, I will accept your two not guilty verdicts. And, as I say, I understand this is a difficult matter for you to deal with, and I'm not sure that given the time of trial involved that we ought to wash all that out right now...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.