Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

659 So. 2d 482

Cubilete v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 25, 1995

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1995-08-25

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2008

2 state decisions

Relies on 655 So. 2d 111 - Reyes v. State · 658 So. 2d 1064 - Publix Supermarkets, Inc. v. Austin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-08-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Alexander D. Cubilete appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft. We affirm the conviction but strike certain probation conditions and costs that were not properly imposed.

¶2Because they were not pronounced at sentencing, we strike the special conditions found in probation conditions four and seven. See Hamilton v. State, 658 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We strike $2 in court costs imposed pursuant to section 948.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because this cost is discretionary but was not orally announced at sentencing; we also strike $215 for the court improvement fund. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc).

¶3Convictions affirmed; certain probation conditions and costs stricken.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.
/659/so2d/482 · .json · Public domain