Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 So. 2d 591 - Glaskox v. State

659 So. 2d 591 - Glaskox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Illinois · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · Cole v. State · 531 So. 2d 598 - Houston v. State · 436 So. 2d 1381 - Morris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Glaskox failed to cross-examine D.G. on this issue during cross-examination in the State's case-in-chief, but rather called her adversely in his case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his is exactly the type of tactics which the discovery rule was specifically created to prevent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “deliberate scheme to gain a substantial tactical advantage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.