Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 So. 2d 93 - Cooper v. Powell

659 So. 2d 93 - Cooper v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Laney v. Early · Lange v. Scofield · 414 So. 2d 892 - Silverman v. Charmac, Inc. · 457 So. 2d 375 - Frander v. Frander, Inc. v. Griffen · 348 So. 2d 454 - Cox v. Walter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the language in a restrictive covenant is clear and unambiguous, it will be given its manifest meaning, but its construction will not be extended by implication to include anything not plainly prohibited.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Brian Nelson, the developer and author of the restrictions, testified that his intent in drafting the subdivision restriction was to restrict further subdivision and resale of the lots and not to restrict the use of a lot to one single-family dwelling. Further testimony by Nelson revealed, as to another lot he had sold in the general area, subject to substantially the same restrictions, two families were living on the lot in separate dwellings."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Mobile homes shall be allowed on lots or parcels only in the half of the property of greatest distance from the property's primary road frontage.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.