Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 So. 2d 98 - C.B. v. Bobo

659 So. 2d 98 - C.B. v. Bobo’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs. (2003), Alabama Republican Party v. McGinley (2004)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

170199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on City of Canton v. Harris · Daniels v. Williams · Stanley v. Illinois · Baker v. McCollan · Hewitt v. Helms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “On appeal, a dismissal is not entitled to a presumption of correctness. The appropriate standard of review under Rule 12(b)(6)[, Ala. R. Civ. P.], is whether, when the allegations of the complaint are viewed most strongly in the pleader’s favor, it appears that the pleader could prove any set of circumstances that would entitle [him] to relief. In making this determination, this Court does not consider whether the plaintiff will ultimately prevail, but only whether [he] may possibly prevail. We note that a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal is proper only when it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of the claim that would entitle the plaintiff to relief.” ’ ””
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Child Abuse Reporting Act creates a duty owed to the general public, not to specific individuals, and, consequently, it does not create a private cause of action in favor of individuals. Therefore, to the extent that the plaintiffs rely on that statute, they fail to state a cause of action, and the trial court properly dismissed the claims insofar as they were based on the statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To state a claim under § 1983, the plaintiff must allege facts constituting a deprivation of a constitutional right, under color of state law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.