659 So. 2d 995 - Dunning v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably 913 So. 2d 460 - Hamm v. State (2002), 955 So. 2d 1037 - Adams v. State (2003)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · 368 So. 2d 871 - Cumbo v. State · Skelton v. City of Birmingham · 471 So. 2d 485 - Faircloth v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The test for determining whether a strike rises to the level of a challenge for cause is `whether a juror can set aside their opinions and try the case fairly and impartially, according to the law and the evidence.' Marshall v. State, 598 So.2d 14, 16 (Ala.Cr.App.1991). `Broad discretion is vested with the trial court in determining whether or not to sustain challenges for cause.' Ex parte Nettles, 435 So.2d 151, 153 (Ala.1983)."”
14 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tomlin v. State · Russell v. State““Here, Officer Barnwell observed the appellant running from the general area of Jones’s house immediately after receiving the call regarding a burglary in process. Odessa Jones had ample time to observe the appellant while he was in her house. Officer Barnwell brought the appellant to Jones’s house and she identified the appellant as one of the robbers within minutes of the robbery. ... The victim’s identification was reliable and the circumstances surrounding the identification were not impermissibly suggestive.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Wimes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.