State v. Barner’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2005
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watkins v. Oklahoma · Henson v. Wyrick · Holt v. Wyrick · Anderson v. Frey · State v. McGoldrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not mean to say that there was any fraud practiced in this case. That is beside the point. The legislature has seen fit to prescribe the manner of selecting juries. The officers charged with this duty must at least substantially comply with the procedure prescribed. Courts are not authorized to ignore, emasculate, or set aside the statutory provisions.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sardeson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.