Schmidt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2012
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ventresca · Lopez v. State · Heredia v. State · Peltier v. State · Collins v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The facts submitted to the magistrate, however, must be sufficient to justify the conclusion that the property that is the object of the search is probably on the premises to be searched at the time the warrant issues, [emphasis in original, citing authorities] [and] “The affidavit in the instant case fails to state when the affiant received the information from Bell ... or when Bell obtained his information. There is nothing in the affidavit to demonstrate when the incident it describes took place.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Crider v. State · Lighter v. State“[i]t is apparent that the magistrate could not ascertain the closeness of time to issue the warrant based on an independent judgment of probable cause”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Crider v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.