Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 659 SW2D 804 - McCormic v. Smith

McCormic v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2022

7 state decisions

3019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Memphis Street Railway Co. v. Johnson · 42 Tenn. App. 15 - Howell v. Wallace E. Johnson, Inc. · Escue v. Lux Time Division of Robertshaw Controls

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n all cases tried by a jury, no issue presented for review shall be predicated upon error in the admission or exclusion of evidence, jury instructions granted or refused, misconduct of jurors, parties or counsel, or other action committed or occurring during the trial of the case, or other ground upon which a new trial is sought, unless the same was specifically stated in a motion for a new trial; otherwise such issues will be treated as waived.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the trial judge might be given an opportunity to consider or to reconsider alleged errors committed during the course of the trial or other matters affecting the jury or the verdict, such as alleged misconduct of jurors, parties, or counsel which either occurred after the trial or could not reasonably have been discovered until after the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.