66 CAL2D 170 - In re Pike

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1980

18 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

BURKE, J.

¶1I dissent from the reversal of the judgment

¶2imposing the death penalty. Prom my examination of the entire cause (as mandated by section 13 of article VI of the California Constitution ) I am not of the opinion that it is *175reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the defendant would have been reached in the absence of the errors set forth in the majority opinion. (See People v. Watson, 46 Cal.2d 818, 836 [299 P.2d 243], and the dissents in People v. Luker, 63 Cal.2d 464, 479 [47 Cal.Rptr. 209, 407 P.2d 9]; In re Spencer, 63 Cal.2d 400, 414 [46 Cal.Rptr. 753, 406 P.2d 33]; In re Gaines, 63 Cal.2d 234, 240 [45 Cal.Rptr. 865, 404 P.2d 473] ; People v. Hillery, 62 Cal.2d 692, 714 [44 Cal.Rptr. 30, 401 P.2d 382] ; In re Lessard, 62 Cal.2d 497, 513 [42 Cal.Rptr. 583, 399 P.2d 39] ; and People v. Terry, 57 Cal.2d 538, 569, 572 [21 Cal.Rptr. 185, 370 P.2d 985].) In all other respects I concur in the opinion of the majority.

¶3McComb, J., concurred.