In Re Ford’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably 18 Cal. 3d 873 - People v. Miller (1977), 1 Cal. 3d 368 - People v. Bauer (1969)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Neal v. State of California · 65 Cal. 2d 650 - In re Wright · 63 Cal. 2d 671 - People v. Ridley · People v. Ford · In re Heedly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because the People alleged and proved and the jury found that he kidnaped victims A, B, and C for the purpose of robbery (count I) as well as robbing C (count II).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.