Keating v. Basich Bros. Construction Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1976
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 21 Cal. 2d 176 - Roy v. Salisbury · Evans v. Gibson · 46 Cal. App. 2d 285 - Thompson v. Stoakes · In Re Estate of Ross · Frazure v. Fitzpatrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The general rule prevailing in California on this subject is this: Where there is competent independent evidence in the record which supports the judgment without recourse to the testimony erroneously admitted, generally the error is not prejudicial as it will be presumed on appeal that the trial judge considered and relied upon the competent evidence in mating his findings and rendering the judgment. (Evans v. Gibson, 220 Cal. 476 [ 31 P.2d 389 ] ; Roy v. Salisbury, 21 Cal.2d 176 [ 130 P.2d 706 ] ; Frazure v. Fitzpatrick, 21 Cal.2d 851 [ 136 P.2d 566 ]; Ford v. Lou Kum Shu, supra, [ 26 Cal.App. 203 ( 146 P. 199 )]; Watt v. Copeland, 92 Cal.App. 161 [ 267 P. 928 ] ; Cordi v. Garcia, 56 Cal.App.2d 584 [ 132 P.2d 887 ].)””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.