Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 CALAPP2D 436 - Ades v. Brush

Ades v. Brush’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 1989 · most notably Louie v. Hagstrom's Food Stores, Inc. (1947), San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Kelly D. (1989)

54 state decisions

22019441950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 18 Cal. 2d 798 - Hatfield v. Levy Brothers · Sanderson v. Niemann · 20 Cal. 2d 585 - Speck v. Sarver · Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp. · Lafargue v. United Railroad of San Francisco

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is also well settled that the failure of a complaint to state a cause of action is not fatal to a judgment for the plaintiff unless the appellant can show that the error has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Where the parties at the trial treat a certain issue as being involved, and the judgment is based on that issue, it is not a prejudicial error that the complaint defectively alleges, or fails to allege at all, that issue.” (Italics added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.