Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 CALAPP2D 778 - Miller v. Lee

Miller v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
July 1973
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1973 · most notably Meyer v. State Board of Equalization (1954), 122 Cal. App. 2d 116 - Thomasset v. Thomasset (1953)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

1701944195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 18 Cal. 2d 146 - Jaffe v. Stone · People v. Kilvington · Ball v. Rawles · Burke v. Watts · 52 Cal. App. 2d 10 - Miller v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The approved method is for the court to instruct the jury that if they find and determine certain questions of fact properly submitted to them to be true or untrue, their verdict must be for plaintiff, or for the defendant, as the case may be.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.