Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 CALAPP2D 894 - People v. Peak

People v. Peak’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently November 1989 · most notably 1 Cal. 3d 444 - People v. Hood (1969), 28 Cal. 2d 306 - People v. Peete (1946)

42 state decisions

12019441950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 25 Cal. 2d 177 - People v. McCoy · People v. Mayen · 2 Cal. 2d 527 - People v. Miller · In Re Shull · People v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant, with Kolb in view, started ■ his automobile from a stationary position, accelerated it, and steered it directly toward Kolb. He traveled about 20 feet and struck Kolb. It may be reasonably inferred from this evidence that defendant, with the present ability, unlawfully attempted to commit a violent injury on Kolb. All of the essential elements of assault were proved. The evidence is ample to show that defendant had the intention and the present ability to commit a violent injury on the person of another.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of section 1881 of the Code of Civil Procedure is to hold intact the confidence which naturally arises from the relationship of husband and wife. It is not the act of communication but the substance thereof that is held legally inviolate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.