In re Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1919
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1971
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Keefe · Arrowsmith v. State · United States v. Fox · Ex parte Stanley · Rogers v. Fitzsimmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * There is no attempt to justify or explain the delay and we must conclude that none is possible. It was distinctively the duty of the prosecution to move in the matter. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hicks v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.