Bensiek v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
66 F. 104 · 1895
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2002
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mount Pleasant v. Beckwith · Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co. · Koehler v. The Black River Falls Iron Company · The " Stephen Morgan." · Claflin v. Farmers' & Citizens' Bank of Long Island
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““when an act done by a private corporation is not per se illegal, or malum prohibitum, but is simply ultra vires, and is not a matter of public concern, but merely affects the interests of the stockholders, the latter may so act as to deprive themselves of the right to challange its validity.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.