Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 F.2d 271 - Rosenberg v. McLaughlin

Rosenberg v. McLaughlin’s Empirical Analysis

66 F.2d 271 · 1933

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
September 1997
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1997

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

701933194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1101 · 26 U.S.C. § 115 · 26 U.S.C. § 116

Relies on Phillips v. Commissioner · Phillips v. Commissioner · New York Trust Co. v. Eisner · Hertz v. Woodman · United States v. Updike

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Unless the tax is sooner paid in full, it shall be a lien for ten years upon the gross estate of the decedent, except that such part of the gross estate as is used for the payment of charges against the estate and expenses of its administration, allowed by any court having jurisdiction thereof, shall be divested of such lien. If the Commissioner is satisfied that the tax liability of an estate has been fully discharged or provided for, he may, under regulations prescribed by him with the approval of the Secretary, issue his certificate, releasing any or all property of such estate from the lien herein imposed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.