Impiriale v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis
66 F.2d 805 · 1933
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1953
6 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 220
Relies on Weeks v. United States · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Japanese Immigrant Case · United States v. Ju Toy · Low Wah Suey v. Backus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Since deportation proceedings are administrative and the action of the Secretary of Labor is intended by the statutes to be final, there is no regulatory power in the cotirts to control the course of such proceedings while pending in the Department. “The jurisdiction of the courts is contingent, and usually to be exercised by a writ of habeas corpus ex post facto of an order of deportation.” (Italics added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.