Kalt v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably United States v. Sumner (2000), Lehman v. United States (1998)
19 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 158
Relies on Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · 102 S. Ct. 969 - United States v. Security Industrial Bank · Akers v. United States · Israel v. Futuronics Corp. · Brody v. Guercio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If [a party] had alleged fraud upon the court, the court could have asserted ancillary jurisdiction because that doctrine is available to a court to 'vindicate its authority, and effectuate its decrees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For a federal court to have subject matter jurisdiction to hear an independent action there must be some statutory or constitutional basis for its jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“satisf[ying] his burden of establishing federal court jurisdiction”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.