Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 F.3d 1226

Docket No. 95-5001.

Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-10-04

Relies on Taylor v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1995-10-04

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Nevin M. Katz, M.d., v. Georgetown University, et al. (2001), 63 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Vencor Nursing Centers, L.P. v. Shalala (1999)

27 district ·

210199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before: SILBERMAN, WILLIAMS and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

¶2ORDER

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Upon consideration of appellant’s Petition for Rehearing, it is

¶5ORDERED, by the Court, that the opinion filed herein on June 23,1995, 56 F.3d 1497, is amended, as follows:

¶6At Page 2, Paragraph 2 [56 F.3d at 1500.]

delete the first sentence and insert in lieu thereof
We vacate the district court’s order to the extent it is moot and affirm that order in all other respects.

¶7At Page 20 [56 F.3d at 1509.]

delete the last paragraph and insert in lieu thereof
The district court’s order denying a preliminary injunction is vacated to the extent moot and in all other respects affirmed for the reasons stated above.

¶8So Ordered.

/66/f3d/1226 · .json · Public domain