Bulldog Trucking Incorporated Cooper v. B & L Incorporated Bulldog Trucking Incorporated M Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[n]othing in this Act ... shall be construed as limiting or otherwise affecting application of ... title 28, United States Code, relating to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States (including bankruptcy courts)....”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Cooper v. Stonier Transportation Group, Inc. · St. Johnsbury Trucking Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co. (In Re St. Johnsbury Trucking Co.)

2. “[T]he filed rate doctrine is meant to prevent discriminatory pricing and to promote reasonable rates. Maislin, 497 U.S. at 116 , 110 S.Ct. at 2760-61 . By limiting the applicability of certain provisions of the Rates Act to claims of carriers no longer transporting property, Congress has determined that those concerns no longer apply to nonoperating carriers and therefore there is no need strictly to apply the filed rate requirement to such carriers.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co. (In Re St. Johnsbury Trucking Co.)

3. “[T]he requirements of 49 U.S.C. Sec. 10701(f)(1)(A) do not apply to shippers seeking to defeat claims under paragraph 9.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Whitaker v. Power Brake Supply, Inc.