Von Robinson v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
66 F.3d 249 · 1995
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2020
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Mitan v. United States · United States v. Harding · 9 Cal. 4th 1178 - People v. Bruner · 48 Cal. 3d 487 - In Re Joyner · McQueary v. Blodgett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that where a period of presentence custody stems from multiple, unrelated incidents of misconduct, such custody cannot be credited against the subsequent formal term of incarceration if the prisoner has not shown that the conduct which underlies the term to be credited was also a “but for” cause of the earlier restraint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For statutory challenges made on Equal Protection grounds, the general rule is that legislation is presumed to be valid and will be sustained if the classification drawn by the statute is rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.