Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 F.3d 316

Docket No. 95-6944.

Nasim v. Rickards

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 24, 1995 Decided Sept. 18, 1995

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-18

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-09-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Alvin Jackson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying Appellant's request for reconsideration of the court's prior orders which denied relief sought under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nasim v. Rickards, No. CA-93-348-2 (E.D. Va. May 17 & June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. In view of our disposition of this appeal, we deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and provision of a transcript at government expense.

AFFIRMED

/66/f3d/316 · .json · Public domain