Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

66 F.3d 316

Docket No. 95-6948.

Nemo v. Dempsey

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 24, 1995. Decided Sept. 18, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-09-18

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-09-18

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joseph L. Nemo, appellant pro se.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Before WIDENER, HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

¶2

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nemo v. Dempsey, No. CA-94-1617-AM (E.D.Va. June 13, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

/66/f3d/316 · .json · Public domain