Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 F.3d 36 - Jayaraj v. Scappini

Jayaraj v. Scappini’s Empirical Analysis

66 F.3d 36 · 1995

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Molloy v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority (1996), Llc v. Llc I Llc Sa

5 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

320199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866)

Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Sampson v. Murray · Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. · Tom Doherty Associates, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc. · Citibank Na v. Citytrust

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here monetary damages may provide adequate compensation, a preliminary injunction should not issue.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 634 F. Supp. 2d 373 - Mullins v. City of New York · 712 F. Supp. 2d 70 - JP Morgan SEC. v. LOUISIANA CITIZENS PROP. INS.
  2. “upon an issue of state law, namely, whether seemingly conflicting provisions of the [New York] City- Charter and municipal regulations give [HANAC] a property inr terest in employment entitling [it] to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Hellenic American Neighborhood Action Committee v. City of New York
  3. “the temporary loss of income, ultimately to be recovered, does not usually constitute irreparable injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parisien

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.