Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 FLA 358 - Pou v. Ellis

Pou v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall corruptly falsify or avoid any record ... or shall fraudulently alter, deface or falsify any minutes, documents, books or any proceedings whatever, of, or belonging to any public office.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to tamper with, as to falsify a record of [sic] document.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in Webster's International Dictionary, is”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.