Anobile v. Pelligrino’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985 · 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina · Burford v. Sun Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prescribe rules ... for effectually preventing the use of improper devices, the administration of drugs or stimulants or other improper acts for the purpose of affecting the speed of harness horses in races in which they are about to participate.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the contours of the December 1997 administrative searches of highly regulated areas such as race tracks were not clearly established.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n order to assure the public's confidence and continue the high degree of integrity in racing at the pari-mutuel betting tracks,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.