Patrick v. Garlick’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Tomka v. Seiler Corp. · KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. A · Salahuddin v. Cuomo · James Wrighten Marie Glowski Alan Paluck New London Board of Education · Rojas v. Roman Catholic Diocese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]n individual defendant may be held liable under the aiding and abetting provision of the NYSHRL if he actually participates in the conduct giving rise to a discrimination claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Popat v. Levy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.