State v. Lesher’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2004
4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Joshua v. MTL, INC.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“By operating the vehicle in question without ascertaining that there was a valid, current no-fault card in the vehicle, appellant acted recklessly with respect to whether her conduct in driving the vehicle was in violation of § 294-8(a)(l), HRS. There were, accordingly, sufficient facts to sustain her conviction [of OAVWONFI].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“§ 431:10C-104 Conditions of operation and registration of motor vehicles, (a) ... no person shall operate or use a motor vehicle upon any public street, road or highway of this State at any timé unless such motor vehicle is insured at all times under a no-fault policy. § 431:10C-107 Verification of insurance: motor vehicles, (a) Every insurer shall issue to its insureds a no-fault insurance identification card for each motor vehicle for which the basic no-fault coverage is written. The identification card shall contain the following: * * * (4) Effective dates of coverage including the expiration date. (b) The identification card shall be in the insured motor vehicle at all times and shall be exhibited to a law enforcement officer upon demand. * * § 431:10C-108 Unlawful use of no-fault insurance identification card. It shall be a violation of this article: (1) For any person to make, issue or knowingly use any fictitious or fraudulently altered no-fault insurance identification card; or (2) For any person to display or cause or permit to be displayed a no-fault insurance identification card knowing that the no-fault policy was canceled as provided in section 431:100-111 and section .431:100-112.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“§ 294-8 Conditions of operation and registration. (a)(1) No person shall operate or use a motor vehicle upon any public street, road, or highway of this State at any time unless such motor vehicle is insured at all times under a no-fault policy. § 294-8.5 Verification of insurance, (a) Every insurer shall issue to its insureds a no-fault insurance identification card for each motor vehicle for which the basic no-fault coverage is written showing the name and make and the factory or serial number of the motor vehicle, policy number, names of the insured and the insurer, and the effective dates of coverage, including the expiration date;____The identification card shall be in the insured motor vehicle at all times and shall be exhibited to a law enforcement officer upon demand. § 294-8.6 Unlawful use of no-fault insurance card. It shall be a violation of this chapter for any person who makes, issues, or knowingly uses any fictitious, or fraudulently altered no-fault insurance identification card, or any person who displays or causes or permits to be displayed a no-fault insurance identification card knowing that the no-fault policy was cancelled as provided in section 294-9.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.