¶1I think that the plaintiff is entitled to the full allowance which she claimed on the taxation. The amount of the alleged set-off was, I think, directly involved in the case (Woonsocket Rubber Co. agt. Rubber Clothing Co., supra; Vilmar agt. Sohall, 61 N. Y., 564).
66 How. Pr. 342
Barclay v. Culver
Decided February 15, 1884
New York Supreme Court · decided 1884-02-15
This action was brought by plaintiff, to whom the claim in suit had been assigned, to recover, of defendant the sum of $2,500 and interest. Defendant interposed as a defense and by way of set-off two notes, which with interest were of the aggregate value of $7,996. Upon the trial judgment was rendered for plaintiff upon all the issues involved, and for the full amount claimed by her with interest. The court granted an allowance of five per cent.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1885
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1884-02-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →