Fox v. Cosgriff’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2018
1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 7 E.H. Smith 576 - People v. . Peckens · Phelps v. Grady · Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co. · Stewart v. Harris · Moon v. Benton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`If the parties deal on unequal terms the rule that misrepresentations of value are nonactionable expressions of opinion does not apply and under such circumstances they will constitute remediable fraud, as where the facts are peculiarly within the knowledge of the speaker and difficult for the hearer to ascertain.'" 66 Idaho at page 383 , 159 P.2d at page 229 [See also 37 C.J.S. Fraud § 57].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[I]t was the duty of appellants, and particularly Thamm, as director and cashier, to disclose the fact that the bank was being liquidated, or in the course of negotiations looking to its liquidation which, if consummated, would result in enhancing the value of the stock.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.