Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 Ill. App. 3d 210 - People v. Cole

66 Ill. App. 3d 210 - People v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1994
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Jackson v. Indiana · Moore v. Arizona · 48 Ill. App. 3d 842 - People v. Williams · 39 Ill. App. 3d 358 - People v. Bickham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Our statutory protection of this right, section 103 — 5, states that the time period during which an accused must be tried tolls during the period when he is unfit to stand trial. George Cole was found unfit. While clearly improper, the fact that a review hearing was not held on schedule does not, with respect to section 103 — 5, disturb the presumption of defendant’s continuing unfitness. Therefore, the 120-day period provided by section 103 — 5 did not resume until defendant was found fit to stand trial on January 7, 1977.” People v. Cole, 66 Ill. App. 3d at 212 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Every person in custody in this State for an alleged offense shall be tried by the court having jurisdiction within 120 days from the date he was taken into custody unless the delay is occasioned *** by an adjudication of incompetency for trial, ***.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.