Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 IND 376 - Baugh v. Boles

Baugh v. Boles’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2009

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

5018791880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Potter v. Smith · Musselman v. Kent · Leonard v. Blair · Langford v. Freeman · Cravens v. Duncan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It has long been an accepted rule of law ... that where a person has left his usual place of abode, and no intelligence concerning him has been received by his relatives, or by those who would probably hear from him, if living, after the lapse of seven years ... such person would be presumed to be dead.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.