Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 66 INDAPP 144 - In re Ale

In re Ale’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
November 1971
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently November 1971

21 state decisions

501917192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mitchell v. Overman · Borer v. Chapman · Lytle v. the State of Arkansas · Wabash Railroad v. Dykeman · Bohr v. Neuenschwander

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The board by any or all its members shall hear the parties at issue, their representatives and witnesses, and shall determine the dispute in a summary manner. The award shall be filed with the record of proceedings, and a copy thereof shall immediately be sent to each of the parties in dispute.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.